Difference between revisions of "Talk:Production"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Well, it's a meta-type thing. Unfoturnately [[:Category:Meta|the Meta Category]] refers to the Infosphere site itself. If there was another form of meta, a Meta_Show category, it would definitely go there. - [[User:ClonedWizard|ClonedWizard]] 09:11, 20 August 2006 (PDT) | :Well, it's a meta-type thing. Unfoturnately [[:Category:Meta|the Meta Category]] refers to the Infosphere site itself. If there was another form of meta, a Meta_Show category, it would definitely go there. - [[User:ClonedWizard|ClonedWizard]] 09:11, 20 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Maybe "Show" itself could be the category. Or "Futurama"? That mightcould work... {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 14:53, 20 August 2006 (PDT) | ::Maybe "Show" itself could be the category. Or "Futurama"? That mightcould work... {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 14:53, 20 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
:::"Futurama" is suitable, we can pu [[Futurama]] in there too - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 08:09, 24 August 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:09, 24 August 2006
This page needs a category, but I can't think of what category to put it in. Any ideas? Buddy13
Still needs a category...
- Well, it's a meta-type thing. Unfoturnately the Meta Category refers to the Infosphere site itself. If there was another form of meta, a Meta_Show category, it would definitely go there. - ClonedWizard 09:11, 20 August 2006 (PDT)